Days 2 and 3 (Alex’s Version)
These past two days have been every bit as much fun as I thought they would be. We’ve been helping Jenny do a Western Blot; it’s been really interesting to see the work that Jenny is currently doing and on which she will soon publish a paper. I felt like a true chemist when I got to prepare the wash for the membranes and then mix the antibodies. What we originally thought were mouse antibodies (that we’d put on yesterday) turned out to be guinea-pig and rabbit, so we used donkey-anti-guinea-pig and goat-anti-rabbit antibodies instead.
When we went downstairs to the darkroom, just getting through the door was exciting; it was like a tardis! You have to walk into a small circular chamber which you spin round, and at one point you are in total darkness before emerging into the darkroom. You could easily imagine yourself traveling through time! Maybe my imagination was working overtime, but I found it very exciting. What we did next was even cooler; once everyone was in the darkroom (which wasn’t actually dark yet, as all the lights were on) Jenny sorted out the work space and then plunged us back into total darkness until our eyes adjusted to the faint red lights. Jenny then took x-rays of the membranes with the proteins and antibodies on them and we waited for the results to print out.
After comparing our results back at the lab we discovered that there was a potential problem: one of the controls looked the same as the modified samples instead of looking like the other two controls. This could mean two things: either the entire experiment had failed and we’d have to do it again, or it was simply that the control was protein-deficient in general. If it was the latter, it would be fine. But we could not be sure this was the case until we tested it with a completely different antibody that should show up the same on all the samples: if the control truly was protein-deficient, then the x-ray line would be fainter. We shall find out tomorrow, the mystery plot continues…
And now we come to the highlight of the day: the super confocal microscope! It was absolutely awesome. We went downstairs with Jenny and her collection of slides to a small room with a cool swanky looking microscope which had a separate set of dials and was linked up to a computer where we could see the images of the cells. The first one was a normal control cell where they all looked round and happy. Jenny then put on a slide where a gene had been knocked out and this had made the cells all spiky. And they were so spiky! So we got to search for a cell that looked particularly impressive, and when we put it up on the screen I swear it looked like a person. Well, a cell with a bit sticking out that looked a bit like a head, with a very spiky torso, two misshapen arms, one leg and a tail. We named it Spike, which we thought was very appropriate. But the next one we found was even more impressive, being spikier and more dramatic than Spike. Perhaps no one else really saw it this way, but I was pretty sure that it looked like a very spiky bird on a very thorny branch, with a huge strange pointy slug sitting randomly in the top right corner of the field. But it got a name too – we called it Tweet.
I used my phone to take loads of photos of Jenny and Alan doing cool things in the lab (mostly working in the hood and making the gel for the proteins), but unfortunately they seem to be stuck in there and so I can’t show them to everyone yet.
Though hopefully I’ll be able to post the images from the microscope soon. They looked so amazing and beautiful – and as they looked quite alien, for once I think calling them “out of this world” really is appropriate.
So I’m looking forward to another day in the lab, and with any luck we’ll get to see our results! And then the day after that, we’ll see our cells that have had a gene knocked down – and I’ll be able to see how getting rid of Jenny’s pet gene affects the shape of my cells!


It’s all good fun until somebody clones an army of radioactive gorillas and holds the world to ransom.
Jenny, Alex, Alan,
This whole idea of blogging and videoing work experience is utter genius. I won’t say why I think it is utter genius, as this may cause the students to start to self-analyse … but it is the best idea ever. I just wish all this supportive technology was around in 1986 when I did my work experience in a lab.
My time spend at Chem Path at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary was less pleasant than life at UCL-Rohn. We arrived on a Tuesday and were tasked with sorting out the morning batch of blood samples coming in from the wards. Any they were broken were tossed into a bucket that some joker had labelled ‘AIDS’. It was 1986. AIDS was new and scary, but even then I knew that it was impossible to have AIDS in a bucket. HIV in a bucket was another thing altogether.
Wednesday was Poo Day. This was the day on which we ran the samples of poo to do cultures or some such. I cannot remember the details save for the fact that the first experimental step was to make diarrhoea out of whatever the patient had deposited. I think that Poo Day was also the day on which I discovered how utterly benign and normal it can be to pour 25ml of some old bloke’s piss up your lab coat sleeve.
Quite why, after that experience, I ever went into a lab again is beyond me. But I did. And I was OK at it too. Well, OK in that I can work out a colossal serial dilution with the casual flair of a Lionel Blair two-step.
Nige.
OMG. Poo, piss and blood. I can’t imagine anything more awful for one’s first experience in the lab.
western blot is lowercase >:)
Southern blot is capitalised because it’s named after Ed Southern who invented the technique. The other two (northern & western) are names after cardinal points because scientists have a sense of humour and ties in the the central dogma.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_dogma_of_molecular_biology
Bit of science history for you there.
“Well, a cell with a bit sticking out that looked a bit like a head, with a very spiky torso, two misshapen arms, one leg and a tail. We named it Spike, which we thought was very appropriate. But the next one we found was even more impressive, being spikier and more dramatic than Spike. Perhaps no one else really saw it this way, but I was pretty sure that it looked like a very spiky bird on a very thorny branch, with a huge strange pointy slug sitting randomly in the top right corner of the field.”
I would *LOVE* to see cell morphologies described like this in the literature!!
LMAO
Not all journals agree with Wikipedia on the style of capitalization of Northern and Southern blot, I’m afraid. And thank goodness, because that would make the world boring.
Hopefully pictures of the cells will follow soon! Watch this space.
Yeah, wikipedia be damned.
Pah, I’m with Tiddles on this one. Southern = dude with a beard, has a blot named after him. Northern, western – not so much.
But I agree with rpg in general. Wikipedia, damned, no problem.
I didn’t get it from Wikipedia. I learned that before there even was a Wikipedia :p